Arthur Lourie

On June 12, 1940, Paris officially became an “open city,” which meant that it was given up to the Germans without a fight. On the same day Arthur Vincent Lourié (1891–1966), a Russian composer of Jewish origin who had lived in Paris since 1923, left the city in panic with his latest romantic companion, Elizaveta (Ella) Belevskaya-Zhukovskaya. The previous day Lourié still believed that there was no reason for him to abandon Paris and his beloved piano on 11 avenue Mozart. By the time he realized that remaining in the city was not an option, there were no more trains to take; he left with stuffing a few shirts into a suitcase and drove out of the city in the car of his companion’s daughter.

The journey was ardous. They spent the first night in the open field, anxious about spies. They were searched, beaten, and feared for their lives. The trip to Vichy, the first city in which refugees were allowed to stay, took a week. Lourié and Ella reached Vichy on June 19. The next morning the Germans arrived in the city. On August 18 authorities began to expel all foreigners, independent of their nationality. It is unclear to which category Lourié belonged in the eyes of the Vichy government: French citizen of foreign origin (he had been a French citizen since April 1926), Russian or Jewish. Influential friends helped with advice, money, and eventually with obtaining an American visa that enabled Lourié to escape to the United States.

Lourié’s escape from France was no more difficult than that of other refugees. Yet the experience was significant because it was the first time in his life when he had to throw in his lot with other Jews. Lourié, who had converted to Catholicism in 1913 to marry his first wife, the Polish Catholic Yadviga Tsïbulskaya, seems to have cared little about his Jewish identity. In his youth he tried to hide it by changing his name from Naum Izraílevich Lur’ya to Arthur Vincent Lourié. He was born on May 14, 1891, in Propoysk, a small town in Belarus in the Pale of Settlement, which emcompassed territories in Belarus, Lithuania, Moldova, Ukraine, Latvia, and the eastern part of Poland, and beyond which Russia’s Jewish population could not move without special permission. Lourié believed that his name was Sephardic and his ancestors were related to the famous sixteenth-century kabbalist Isaac ben Solomon Luria, Ha-Ari (1534–1572). There is little evidence to support Lourié’s assertion of his family’s Sephardic origin. Most Louriés (with various spelling as Lourie, Lurje, Loria, Lurja) from the Pale of Settlement were Ashkenazi Jews whose ancestry could be traced to Germany or Eastern Europe.

From Propoysk Lourié’s family moved to Odessa, the fourth largest city in the Russian Empire which had a mixed population, more than thirty percent of which was Jewish. In Odessa Lourié attended the Nicholas I Commercial High School. In 1909 he entered the St. Petersburg Conservatory, an institution that, under the directorship of Alexander Glazunov, admitted a much higher number of Jewish students than any other institution of higher learning in Russia. At the time of Lourié’s entrance, almost half of the Conservatory’s students were Jewish. Insufficiently prepared for his entrance exam, Lourié was placed into the lowest piano class and assigned to Vladimir Nikolayevich Drozdov as his piano teacher. Mariya Barinova, who became Lourié’s piano teacher in 1912, remembered Lourié as one of her most original students.

Although he never received his diploma from the St. Petersburg Conservatory, Lourié turned himself into the musical authority in the city’s avant-garde circles in the 1910s. Instead of winning gold medals and attending classes, he joined St. Petersburg’s artistic elite, the Symbolists, Acmeists, Futurists, and Cubo-Futurists, absorbing artistic trends and filtering them between various media. He shaped his music not according to the outmoded, rigorous professional standards taught at the Conservatory, but according to new ideas he picked up from artists of all stripes.

His early works in St. Petersburg suggest the influence of Chopin, Scriabin, Debussy, and later Schoenberg. Scriabin’s influence, like Symbolism in general, never faded. Debussy’s legacy also remained central in his music. Lourié was more concerned with timbre, register, and contrasts in color than with pitch and rhythm. He loved extremely low registers that turned pitches into noise and blurred harmonic implications, and overpacked textures in which volume and density obscured the clarity of lines. Schoenberg’s atonal experiments inspired his extra-tonal explorations. Dissonant clusters, chords with disharmonious components remained a constant element even in works with much less radical sound. His best known pieces from this early period are for piano: Synthèses, op. 16 (1914), Formes en l’air (1915), and a series of pieces for children, Rojal’ v detskoy (Piano in the Nursery) (1917).

Lourié’s name appears frequently in the memoirs and diaries of famous St. Petersburg poets, painters, and artists. He was especially attracted to poets, and according to at least one account, he tried his hand at poetry. The poet Anna Akhmatova was his lover. He roamed the streets of St. Petersburg with another Acmeist poet, Osip Mandelstam, and gave advice on music to Russia’s most famous Symbolist poet, Aleksandr Blok. A dandy with refined taste, Lourié was painted by well-known Russian artists: Yury Annenkov, Pyotr Miturich, Georgy Yakulov, Lev Bruni, and Savely Sorin. He appears in photographs with important Russian Futurists, painters and poets, his omni-presence earning him the Futurist poet Vladimir Mayakovsky’s ironic quip: “Tis a blockhead who doesn’t know Lourié.” Many concerts that featured his music in pre-Revolutionary Russia took place in the famous cabaret, The Stray Dog. During this time, which came to be called a “Silver Age” in Russia, conceptions of art were expanding—Lourié was ready to apply these new ideas to music.

The Russian Revolution and the onset of civil war put an end to the artistic dreams of the Silver Age. Despite the daily violence, the Revolution initially appeared to be the realization of the Futurists’ program. Like some other radical intellectuals, Lourié welcomed the Revolution and joined the Bolshevik administration as Anatoly Lunacharsky’s chief commissar of music. It was the most exalted position he would ever hold. He paid a high price for it later in emigration, where hard feelings about his commissar past and thinly veiled anti-Semitism kept him apart from the Russian immigrant community. During his brief revolutionary stint, his dandyish, aristocratic habits were reformulated as Bolshevik radicalism and administrative work took the place of artistic projects.

Lourié did not last long in his new position. He defected in 1922, leaving Soviet Russia, ostensibly on an official trip to Berlin, never to return. He joined millions of Russian refugees trying to make a new life in the West. In Paris, where he had lived from 1923 to 1940, revolutionary ideals were replaced with new aesthetics, as Lourié, acting as the close ally of Igor Stravinsky, converted to neoclassicism. Studying Stravinsky’s music and working in close proximity with him affected Lourié’s aesthetics more than his music. He had neither Stravinsky’s meticulousness and precision, nor his rhythmic drive, and thus never became a Stravinsky epigon. As the Russian music critic Boris de Schloezer later wrote, Stravinsky served as the perfect stimulus for Lourié to develop his own unique musical personality. His most known neoclassical works are A Little Chamber Music for string quartet (1923/24), Toccata (1924) and Gigue (1927) for piano.

"A Picnic in the Vallee de la Chevreuse", 1926 From right to left: Igor Stravinsky, Olga Glebova-Sudejkina, Tamara Lourie (-Persitz), Arthur Lourie. By courtesy of Paul Sacher Stiftung Basel, Igor Stravinsky Collection. Colourised and deblurred from original by WO.

In Paris Lourié became a friend and disciple of Jacques Maritain and joined his neo-Thomist circle. He developed an especially strong bond with Maritain’s Russian Jewish wife, Raïssa, who was, like Lourié a convert from Judaism, and who considered him a visionary artist and a mystic with great potential for religious revelations. Their relationship survived the ups and downs of their lives, landing Lourié in the home of the Maritains in Princeton a year after Raïssa’s death in 1960.     

In the 1930s Lourié’s music began to gain recognition in Paris, culminating in the 1936 Paris premiere of his Concerto spirituale (1929), a work for triple chorus, orchestra, and piano, which served as a model for Stravinsky’s better known Symphony of Psalms (1930)Critics celebrated the work and a handful of close friends developed a vocabulary that could effectively describe Lourié’s music. This was the most important what-if moment in Lourié’s career, the result of years of efforts to help him step of out Stravinsky’s shadow. Raïssa Maritain worked tirelessly to build toward this moment, recruiting people, pulling strings, organizing concerts, and making sure that the right critics received complimentary tickets. Lourié seemed to have arrived and scored a contract with the Paris Opera for the performance of his opera-ballet, The Feast During the Plague (1929–1933). But history intervened again and Lourié had to flee Nazi-occupied Paris for New York.

In his years in Paris Lourié divided his time between composition and writing. As an advocate of Stravinsky, he penned some of the most influential essays on Stravinsky’s music and aesthetics. Yet his most significant essay at the time, “An Inquiry of Melody” (Modern Music, 1929) suggests already a distance from the aesthetics he himself helped promote. The deeply Catholic Lourié eventually rejected Stravinsky’s cold, objective aesthetics and advocated for a style that favored melody, expression, emotional engagement, and religious inspiration. In his post-Stravinskian music Lourié strove to write appealing melodies and keep expression close to the surface of the music. His musical language became less harshly dissonant, yet it never became simple. Melodies appeared that resembled Gregorian chant, although Lourié rarely quoted original tunes. Although it is possible to point to the origin of some stylistic features in Lourié’s work and to recognize compositional habits, it is nevertheless difficult to put his music into well-defined stylistic categories. Containing seemingly contradictory stylistic elements and aesthetic trends, Lourié’s music, like his personality, is original and does not conform to expectations.

Lourié could not establish himself in the United States. Past age fifty, he could no longer change his habits and adjust to his new environment. There were a few years of hope while his patron, the conductor Serge Koussevitzky, was still alive and performed some of his major symphonic works with the Boston Symphony Orchestra—his Sonate liturgique (1928) in 1931, his Sinfonia dialectica (1930) in 1933 his Second Symphony, “Kormchaya” (1936–1939) in 1941, his Suite from A Feast During the Plague (1942–1945) in 1945, and his Concerto da camera (1945–1948) in 1948.

After Koussevitzky’s death in 1951, performance opportunities largely dried up for Lourié. His exquisite Little Gidding, a setting of lines from T. S. Eliot’s The Four Quartets for tenor and instrumental ensemble, was performed in Paris in 1951. Apart from that performance, Lourié seems to have been forgotten in post-war France just as he became erased from Russian musical life after his defection of the Soviet Union in 1922. Lourié, who after the Revolution was supposed to compose for the masses, now composed for his desk drawer. His neoclassicism faded and his nostalgia became overwhelming.

Tellingly, the opera that consumed his energies in his American years, The Blackamoor of Peter the Great (1949–1961), was a tribute to his lost homeland and its greatest poet, Alexander Pushkin, whose unfinished novel about his African great-grandfather served as the basis of Lourié’s libretto. Proposing an opera with a black protagonist in the 1960s showed Lourié’s inability to grasp the complexity of American racial politics. He spent his last years in the house of Maritain at Princeton, New Jersey. Forgotten as a composer, Lourié was nevertheless sought out as one of the last surviving witnesses of pre-Revolutionary Russian culture, a treasure trove for Slavists interested in the lives of Silver-Age Russian poets and artists. The Blackamoor of Peter the Great, which Lourié thought was his greatest work, has never been performed. Although in the 1990s the Russian violinist Gidon Kremer initiated a brief renaissance of Lourié’s music, many of his pieces remain unperformed.

Klára Móricz

Sources 

Belyakayeva-Kazanskaya, Larisa. “Artur, Yadviga i Anna.” Kultura, no. 50 (7110), December 25, 1997, 6.

——. “Moy pervïy drug, moy drug bestsennïy . . . (Pis'ma Artura Lur'ye Ivanu Yakovkinu, 1912–1915).” In Ekho serebryanogo veka, 131–56. St. Petersburg: KANON, 1998.

Emerson, Caryl. “Artur Vincent Lourié’s ‘Blackamoor of Peter the Great’: Pushkin’s Exotic Ancestor as Twentieth-Century Opera.” In Under the Sky of my Africa: Alexander Pushkin and Blackness. Edited by Catharine Theimer Nepomnyashchy, Ludmilla A. Trigos, and Nicole Svobodny, pp. 332–67. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2006.

Korabelnikova, L. Z. “Amerikanskiye dnevniki Artura Lur’ye (K probleme muzïkal’noy emigratsii ‘pervoy vol’nï’).” In Keldïshevskiy sbornik: Muzïkal’no-istoricheskiye chteniya pamyati Yu. V. Keldïsha 1977, 232–39. Moscow, 1999.

Levidou, Katerina. “Eurasianism in Perspective: Souvchinsky, Lourié and the Silver Age.” In Russian Émigré Culture: Conservatism or Evolution? Edited by Christoph Flamm, Henry Keazor, and Roland Marti, 203–27. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.

Meyer, Felix. “Brückenschlag zur Vergangenheit. Zu Arthur Louriés Concerto da camera.” Mitteilungen der Paul Sacher Stiftung, Nr. 23, April 2010, 26–32.

Móricz, Klára. “Shadows of the Past: Akhmatova’s Poem without a Hero and Lourié’s Incantations.” twentieth-century music 5, no. 1 (2008): 79–108.  

——. “Symphonies and Funeral Games: Lourié’s Critique of Stravinsky’s Neoclassicism.” In Stravinsky and His World. Edited by Tamara Levitz, pp. 105–26. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.

———. “A Feast in Time of Plague.” In idem. In Stravinsky’s Orbit: Responses to Modernism in Russian Paris, pp. 173–207. Oakland, CA.: University of California Press, 2020.

———.. “The Rebirth of Melody in Lourié’s Post-Neoclassical Concerto da camera.” In Analytical Approaches to 20th-Century Russian Music. Edited by Inessa Bazayev and Christopher Segall, pp. 155–72. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2020.

Móricz, Klára and Simon Morrison eds. Funeral Games in Honor of Arthur Vincent Lourié, pp. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.